Monday, February 27, 2017

When Punk Went CEO



My parents weren’t in the business sector, but I was exposed to my fair share of it growing up. Dad ate his Shredded Wheat with the Wall Street Journal splayed open on the table. And in those years when I no longer had sleepovers but didn’t yet have my driver’s license, I watched “The McLaughlin Group” on Friday nights as Mom snoozed on the couch.

But I learned the truth from Fugazi.

Before it became a genre, “indie” was an ethos that said more about the means of production than it did some musical aesthetic. Labels like SST, Touch & Go, and Fugazi’s Dischord Records weren’t marketers—they were curators, manufacturers, and evangelists. They delivered the religious doctrine that got me through adolescence.

And Fugazi was more than the sum of its songs. The band—Ian McKaye, Guy Picciotto, Joe Lally, and Brendan Canty — was the live expression of a life philosophy. They kept their album and ticket prices low so that kids like me could afford to have our lives changed. More than once, I even saw McKaye personally refund a concertgoer’s money for not living up to his ethical standard: don’t mosh, stay cool, and get woke. They didn’t even sell t-shirts, no matter how much I wanted girls to know I listened to good music. Look to the song “Merchandise” for a summation of their philosophy:
Merchandise keeps us in line
Common sense says it’s by design
What could a businessman ever want more
Than to have us sucking in his store

I followed the rules, got good grades, and (largely) stayed out of trouble. In other words, I was compliant. Which is precisely why I loved underground music. Independent bands like Fugazi, Mission of Burma, and Minutemen embodied the kind of resistance I could embrace: sensible political and economic dissent. They also taught me the basic (ultimately simplistic) premise that big business can’t be trusted. To this day, even as someone who now works with big businesses, I never forget that a company’s profit-making motives rarely align with the personal goals of its employees.

Yet I’ve noticed a curious generational divide when it comes to attitudes about the business world—I mean, brands. In high school, I didn’t know anyone who dreamt of being a CEO. This was a time when the acronym conjured up images of rich fuddy-duddies like Lee Iacoccoa, whose bestselling autobiography predicted smug Wall Street-era memoirs like The Art of the Deal. (Take one look at its cover to understand what I mean.)

At most, my classmates resigned themselves to getting “decent” jobs at some boring company. But more likely, my closest friends wanted to be rockstars—whether that meant being an artist, writer, teacher, or actual musician. We were driven by an impulse to buck the system. Our professional goals were the résumé equivalent of a giant middle finger at the Man.

But today, startup founders like Jack Dorsey or Elon Musk are “rockstars.” TED Talks inspire the same rabid following as a mid-90s Lollapalooza second-stage bill. Kids in their 20s once dropped out of college to rent a dump and start bands that railed against the system. Today, they do it to “disrupt” business by designing mobile apps.

To be clear, this isn’t meant to be some gassy screed against millennials. I’ve never bought the low-hanging opinion pieces that make grumpy generalizations about young people’s attitudes and behaviors. These arguments often sound more like a case of revisionist sour grapes than market research.

As an analyst-in-training, I think it’s too easy to reduce an entire generation down to a case of “helicopter parents” or participation trophies. Frankly, I’m not even convinced “adulthood” exists at all (watch this space for more on that later). Either way, I suspect millennials are better defined by their current life stages (e.g., unmarried and no kids) than by some blanket societal variables. Besides, I know Gen Xers who paid hard-earned money to attend the SXSW Conference—not its original music festival. So, this seems more cultural than generational.

And, sure, we still have our anti-Wall Street movements like Occupy and heroes like Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. But, truthfully, the most support I’ve seen for this sentiment is on Facebook.

All of which makes me wonder, Where has all the rock gone?

By “rock,” I mean more broadly any creative act of political dissent. Plenty has been written about the commodification of the arts, particularly punk (see: CDGB Lounge & Bar at Newark Airport). Green Day still sneers and rants about America’s inequities, but the eyeliner and Manic Panic seem too representational to take seriously. Yes, there are bands—Against Me! or Pussy Riot—that live counter-culture in both music and deed. But you (and your parents) will be more likely to hear “indie” music between innings at a baseball game than on the National Mall.

No comments:

Post a Comment